Comments on: Back to the Future Sucks!

By: Zemeckis et Gale avaient raison: les autos voleront en 2015 | Réflexions et recherches de Simon Dor

Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:57:40 +0000

[...] tirée de http://hollywoodphony.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/back-to-the-future-sucks/ (une page qui semble par ailleurs dédiée à prouver à quel point le film est mauvais… que [...]

By: Shmelly

Shmelly — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:08:31 +0000

Hahah, this is an old blog hollywoodphony, but anyway…the fact that you’re funny is the only thing preventing me from hating you and the fact that you like the sequel also makes it okay. You made good points here…
Although, I think the 2nd movie is the most weird one. Why does Marty even HAVE to mess with the future? Why couldn’t Doc just tell him? Makes me question the whole beginning, but worth overlooking because the rest is all fun! I like all 3 movies. Now…
As for Marty not disappearing at all while he’s able to watch his siblings disappear…It’s because nothing has happened yet–he’s in some weird limbo I guess I would say–he has the opportunity to make things go their course, it’s all unsure. So he shouldn’t start to disappear until the moment his parents actually fell in love (at the dance), and if he screws it up. It works. And the car, there’s probably more inside it that somehow prevents the plutonium from burning up everything–ah, who knows, Doc is a genius, so of course he made that piece of shit car into something–only takes 88 mph? That’s a good deal! What if he just had to press a button? Cliche.
Also, The McFlys still live in the same place because Hill Valley is where they grew up, they don’t want to leave. Now if you wanna get into the theory of parallel universes, I’ll start geeking now…It says for every decision there’s an opposite universe created where the decision isn’t made…so in other words, there’s a shitload of other dimensions,and possibly one where Marty wakes up in a completely different country in a huge mansion–but instead he decided to travel 15 minutes to Hill Valley, where he was—-how is he able to control that? Too hard to explain, so they simple saved time and didn’t show it *wink*. BTTF has no problems with the time travel that I can’t argue against—I dare someone to try me! Although, I’m surprised you didn’t mention the number 1 weird thing…

1) Why the hell did they stay friendly with Biff in the future? Who knows what he was going to do to Loraine in ‘55 in that car…but I think he was too dumb as a teen to be truly evil…
2) Also Biff was NOT the one who helped the parents fall in love, it was the mysterious Marty kid they met as teens…So what the hell? Maybe Biffy did something else that made the parents accept him, who knows…

3) They don’t recognize Marty, but oh well. 30 years ago, only knew him for a week. I’d forget too.

I love this movie because I also went to Universal and went on the tour tram every time and that Clock tower brings back memories. I seriously paid no attention to the movies all my life until a year ago. Also you like the second movie because you saw the sets…sounds like nostalgia to me man…The second is actually the most flawed, and you still LIKE it! hah. You like because it gives you memories. Just like how us jackasses like the first movie even if it’s awful…or wait…no it’s not. As for the cheesy lines you claim…Well, that’s your tastes, you have right to that. Goodbye

By: Matt Janovic Nipsy Russell

Matt Janovic Nipsy Russell — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:03:31 +0000

Wow, no mentions of the Delorean (sp?) at all! Back to the Future is like Beverly Hills Cop–we look back and wonder what the hell we were laughing at. Why did we find any of it remotely funny? Because we were kids. Watch either movie and tell me it’s actually funny, I dare you, you’ll be lying.

Now Top Gun–that’s a fucking great movie, forget that Orson Welles asswipe.

By: Pit-Pat

Pit-Pat — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:46:46 +0000

I played the contra-bassoon in my elementary school orchestra. We had to learn “Einstein” in less than a week for a performance at the P.S. 137 Spring Fling Wing-Ding.

I still have scar tissue on my lungs from the part where the time signature goes to second order linear equations..

But, by God we learned “Einstein”.

By: Ginger Ale

Ginger Ale — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:55:09 +0000

Hahahaha! Yeah, what she said, you moron.

By: Akiko Ito

Akiko Ito — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:21:33 +0000

You have never heard of escapism?

Plus, the whole trilogy brings up issues involved that every scientist wonders about.

I suggest you learn Einstein.

Dr. Akiko Ito

By: blazingshark

blazingshark — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:24:41 +0000

woof!

By: hollywoodphony

hollywoodphony — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:07:31 +0000

Dear 80’s guy, thanks for reading!
Your points all relate to parts 2 and 3. Here’s the thing that I didn’t have the guts to say: I actually like Back to the Future 2 better than the original. Oh wait, I did say that. So yeah, I agree with you? This is confusing.

By: 80's guy

80's guy — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:01:55 +0000

Back to the Futures are the best movies ever. Just forget for a moment all you remember about the movies. Good. Now I have here in my satchel a series of three movies that will contain.

1) A principle with a shotgun

2) Hoverboards

3) A future where we don’t need roads

4) freeze dried pizzas

and lest I forget 5) a steam train that can travel through time.

Now tell me you don’t want to watch.

So fuck you hollywoodphony. screw your mother your father and your whole family all your friends. Hooooraaayyy!

P.s. thank the emmys for being so boring.

By: Ted

Ted — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:55:00 +0000

Dude, you’re a genius. Why aren’t you replacing Roger Ebert? You’re so against the grain that it just shocks me, you’re so radical that I……………….zzzzzzzzzzzz.